A woman in a striped shirt observes a man writing on a whiteboard in a bright, modern office setting.

Faculty Research

The collective research agenda at the University of Minnesota Rochester (UMR) is different than at any university in the country.

We are a community of learning scholars from many disciplines. As faculty in the UMR Center for Learning Innovation we:

  • focus our primary scholarship on students and their learning
  • honor collaborative endeavors
  • view learning through an interdisciplinary lens
  • pursue provocative questions in the intersections of student learning and development
  • maintain mindful awareness of not only “my course” but also “our curriculum”
  • expect our results to fuel educational innovation for UMR students and other educators

Research at UMR is focused on what matters the most to us: educating future professionals in health care. All of our faculty engage in what is known as the "scholarship of teaching and learning," which means studying the intersection between how faculty teach and how students learn. Of course, we don't just study it--the results are then applied in our classes daily.

In addition to studying education, our faculty conduct research to extend the knowledge within their discipline. And much of the time, our students work side-by-side with faculty on these projects. This work is often featured in our Research and Education Symposium in the spring, along with other studies conducted by students in their courses.

Center for Learning Innovation Published Work

Expand all

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

  • Dingel, M. J., & Sage, S. (2016) Dimensions of difference, sense of belonging, and fitting in: Tensions around developing peer groups, student body diversity, and academic culture. Learning Communities Journal. 8(1):131-156.
  • Huq, A., Nichols, M.D., & Aryal, B. (2016) Building blocks: Threshold concepts and interdisciplinary structures of learning. In Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. pp 135-54. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
  • Iguchi E, Safgren SL, Marks DL, Olson RL, & Fernandez-Zapico ME. (2016) Pancreatic Cancer, A mis-interpreter of the epigenetic language. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 89(4): 575-590
  • Marks DL, Olson RL, & Fernandez-Zapico ME. (2016) Epigenetic control of the tumor microenvironment. Epigenomics. 8 (12):1671-1687
  • Nichols, M. (2016). Listening between the lines: Patient resistance in the case histories of William Smellie. Remedia.
  • Peterson, M. T., Gruhlke, R. C., Sims, R. C., Wright-Peterson, V. M., Karon, B. S., Tynsky, T. A., & ... Lessard, M. S. (2016). Blended learning: Transformation of phlebotomy education at Mayo Clinic. Clinical Laboratory Science. 29(4), 219-226.
  • Petzold, A. M., Nichols, M. D., & Dunbar, R. L. (2016). Leveraging Creative Writing as a Tool for the Review of Foundational Physiological Content. HAPS Educator. 20(4), 76–84.
  • Prat-Resina, X. (2016) Models360 and ChemEd X Data: Web platforms to navigate, represent and interpret chemical data. Educació Química EduQ. 22, 22-30.
  • Schroeder, A. Metzger, K.J., Miller, A., & Rhen, T. (2016). Novel candidate gene for temperature-dependent sex determination in the common snapping turtle. Genetics.203(1):557-571; DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.182840A
  • Wright-Peterson, V. (2016). The women of Mayo Clinic: The founding generation.  Minnesota Historical Society Press.
  • Wright, J. (2016). Restricting mobile device use in introductory philosophy classrooms. Teaching Philosophy. 39(3), 307-327. DOI: 10.5840/teachphil20168552

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2008

Nichols, M.D.  (2008). Cicero’s Pro Cluentio and the ‘mazy’ rhetorical strategies of Wieland. Law and Literature. 20(1), 459-76.

2007

Rhen T., Metzger K., Schroeder A., Woodward R. (2007). Expression of putative sex-determining genes during the thermosensitive period of gonad development in the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. Sexual Development. 1(4):255-70. doi: 10.1159/000104775.

2004

Nichols, M.D. (2004). Bibliography of Jungian and Post-Jungian literary criticism, 1980-2000. In Baumlin, J., Baumlin, T.F., & Jenson, G. (eds.) Post-Jungian Literary Criticism: New Essays in Theory and Practise, pp 263-95. State University of New York Press